Maintaining Hot Food Temperature While Transporting Meals


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Serving hot meals can be a challenge if the meal is served in the housing unit. Serving hot food in a dining facility is straight forward: hot kettle or tilt skillet to heated hot box to heated steam table, then dish it up and hand it over nice and hot. But what if you dish it up and hand it over 45 minutes later? Maybe not so nice and hot now.


What are the key variables that help keep the food hot the longest? What type of food tray and what type of delivery carts can help keep the food hot? We conducted a temperature study to answer those questions. The purpose of this white paper is to interpret the results of that study and offer suggestions for you to better serve hotter meals in housing units. If you aren’t looking for the detail and background of the temperature study but only want to know what is recommended, just skip to the bottom of this article.


THE IMPORTANCE OF HOT FOOD

SAFETY

It is critical to get certain foods up to certain temperatures in order to kill pathogens. Anybody in the food service industry has been trained over and over on what these details are. This paper is not getting into this aspect of hot food. For the purposes of this study, it is assumed that the correct food temperature was reached in the food preparation process. However, after it has been cooked, how hot must the food be kept in order to stay safe? How long will it stay safe? These are key questions to answer when dealing with meals being delivered to the housing units.


After the pathogens are killed in the food preparation process, it takes several hours for pathogens to be reintroduced into the food and grow to a dangerous level. Most standards and guidelines allow 2 hours for hot food to stay out in ambient temperatures before it is too late to serve it safely, some allow 4 hours. Except for extreme circumstances, hot food delivery to the housing units is not really a matter of food safety.

Satisfaction

This is more of what this issue is all about. Have you ever put a spoonful of soup in your mouth only to be surprised that it is lukewarm or cold? You want to spit it back out. If you get everything else right- great recipe, fresh quality ingredients, perfect preparation, it is all for nothing if hot food is served cold. Food that is supposed to be hot but isn’t is very dissatisfying. I was told by a seasoned vet in the corrections industry, “You will see unrest (possibly dangerous unrest) if you mess up on either of two things; mail and food. Don’t ever get those wrong in corrections or you’ll end up paying for it.” There are plenty of articles and reports to back up the connection between food problems and inmate unrest, including full-scale riots.


When we take up the mission to make sure hot food is served hot in the housing units, we are addressing an important safety issue but it’s not food safety. Preventing potential inmate unrest is critical. In a less dramatic tone, serving satisfactory meals improves the morale and temperament of the inmate population, reduces the administrative burden of responding to complaints and lawsuits, and reduces food waste. And in the end, we all take pride in our work and want to do a good job of what we are charged to do.


What is considered a satisfactory temperature for hot food is, of course, subjective. Different people hold different opinions on how hot is hot enough, and different foods have their own desirable “hot” temperatures as well. For instance, soup might not be considered hot enough unless it was at least 150°F, but a hamburger would be probably considered still “hot” if it was 140°F. The general guidance of chefs is for hot food to be served between 140°F and 150°F and anything below 125°F is too cold to serve. For the sake of this study, we will consider anything below 120°F to be unsatisfactory. Each chart will have a red dotted line at that temperature level for comparison.


TEMPERATURE STUDY

In this paper, we analyze the temperature loss over time and compare various combinations of trays and carts. For each trial, we will review the data and draw conclusions. In addition, we’ll analyze key variables in the tray make up process and their effect on the ability to serve hot food. Finally, this paper will summarize key considerations in serving hot food for meals delivered to housing units.

Methodology

Each of the 5 study trials followed the same methodology.


Jones-Zylon-Tested-Trays.jpg

1. TRAY TEST IN INSULATED CART

SUMMARY

ALL NON-INSULATED TRAYS HOLD HEAT ABOUT THE SAME AND NEED TO BE SERVED IN 20-30 MINUTES WHEN DELIVERED IN NON-HEATED CARTS. INSULATED TRAYS HAVE 45-50 MINUTES.

There is a significant variety of meal trays used in corrections. This trial compares trays that stack on one another – self-stacking trays. Some self-stacking trays are filled with foam insulation (insulated trays) and some are solid plastic (Marathon, SmartTray, Stacker, etc.). Three solid plastic self-stacking trays (A, B and C) and one insulated tray (D) were tested in this trial. All were tested in the same cart (Cart 3) to compare results of the tray performance only.


Hot food items were portioned into the same two compartments for each tray and an initial temperature was recorded. The trays were stacked 7 trays high and placed in the food cart and closed the door. The 5 trays in the center of those 7 trays were used to take the temperature measurements.


1-Tray-Test-In-Insulated-Cart.jpg

CONCLUSIONS



2. CART TEST WITH NON-INSULATED TRAY

SUMMARY

IF USING NON-INSULATED TRAYS, YOU SHOULD USE HEATED CARTS TO DELIVER MEALS UNLESS YOU CAN RELIABLY DELIVER THE MEAL IN 20-30 MINUTES.

Though not as numerous as tray options, there are still quite a few variations of meal delivery carts out there. In this study, we compared the temperature retention performance of an insulated plastic cart (1), an enclosed aluminum cart (2), an insulated stainless-steel cart (3), a heated stainless-steel cart (4), and a basic open utility cart (5).


The same tray type was used for all cart trials (Tray A) so that we are only comparing the performance of the carts. Hot food items were portioned into the same two compartments for each tray and an initial temperature was recorded. The trays were stacked 7 trays high and placed in the cart (on top of the cart for the open utility cart). The 5 trays in the center of those 7 trays were used to take the temperature measurements.


2-Cart-Test-with-Non-Insulated-Tray.jpg

CONCLUSIONS



3. CART TEST WITH INSULATED TRAY

SUMMARY

IF USING INSULATED TRAYS, YOU HAVE 45-50 MINUTES TO DELIVER THE MEAL WITH ANY TYPE OF NON-HEATED CART. YOU HAVE AN INDEFINITE AMOUNT OF TIME USING A HEATED CART.

The same carts were tested as in section 2. (an insulated plastic cart, an enclosed aluminum cart, an insulated stainless-steel cart, a heated stainless-steel cart, and a basic open utility cart)


This time a foam insulated tray (D) was used for all tests instead of a solid plastic tray (A). Hot food items were portioned into the same two compartments for each tray and an initial temperature was recorded. The trays were stacked 7 trays high and placed in the cart (on the cart for the open utility cart). The 5 trays in the center of those 7 trays were used to take the temperature measurements.


3-Cart-Test-With-Insulated-Tray.jpg

CONCLUSIONS



4. CART/TRAY SYSTEM TEST

SUMMARY

IF USING NON-INSULATED TRAYS, AN ENCLOSED ALUMINUM CART WILL KEEP THE FOOD JUST AS HOT AS A PLASTIC INSULATED CART.

There is a system in the market that pairs a solid plastic self-stacking tray with a plastic insulated cart. This system pre-supposes that you can deliver the meal in under 30 minutes in order to be able to serve hot food. The purpose of this trial is to compare other cart options using this type of tray. We tested Tray C in three different types of non-heated carts - a basic open utility cart, an enclosed aluminum cart, and the insulated plastic cart that typically gets paired with this tray.


Hot food items were portioned into the same two compartments for each tray and an initial temperature was recorded. The trays were stacked 7 trays high and placed in the cart (on the cart for the open utility cart). The 5 trays in the center of those 7 trays were used to take the temperature measurements.


4-Cart-Tray-System-Test.jpg

CONCLUSIONS



5. TRAY DENSITY IN A NON-HEATED CART

SUMMARY

THE FOOD WILL STAY HOTTER LONGER IN A NON-HEATED CART IF THE CART IS FILLED TO CAPACITY WITH TRAYS. IT WILL COOL FASTER IF YOU DELIVER A SMALL NUMBER OF TRAYS AT A TIME.

This trial is to test the hypothesis that you will improve temperature retention for a non-insulated solid plastic tray by increasing the number of trays placed in the enclosed cart. The idea is sort of like hot coals. If you pile a lot of hot coals together, they will stay hot longer than if you had a small pile of hot coals.


For all the tests in this trial, Tray A and the stainless-steel non-heated cart (Cart 3) were used.


Single stack trial Hot food items were portioned into the same two compartments for each tray and an initial temperature was recorded. The trays were stacked 7 trays high and placed in the cart and door shut. The 5 trays in the center of those 7 trays were used to take the temperature measurements.


Full cart trial The cart was completely filled with food trays. Very little open space remained inside the cart that wasn’t taken up by food trays. For expediency, hot food was only dished into the 9 trays at the center of each stack rather than the entire 18 trays in each stack. The 5 trays in the center of those 9 were used to take the temperature measurements.


5-Tray-Density-In-A-Non-Heated-Cart.jpg

CONCLUSIONS



SUMMARY CONCLUSION

We’ve talked about the reasons that food satisfaction is important in corrections. For those running correctional institutions or the food service operation within, it may not be the number 1 priority, but it definitely makes the list. There are many things that go into how satisfying a meal is, one of which is the temperature level where hot food is served. So, knowing how to ensure temperature retention for meals delivered to the housing units is good information to have. This study provides data-backed Information that can be used to make good decisions.


Based on sections 1-5 of this paper, here are the overall key takeaways from the study data.


  1. 1. If you are using solid plastic meal trays that do not have foam insulation and non-heated carts, you need to be able to deliver the hot meals to the housing units in 20 to 30 minutes fr om tray up in the kitchen to first bite or up to 40 minutes for completely full carts. Any longer than that will result in the hot food being 120°F or less, where hot food will typically be unsatisfying. “My hot dogs are cold”.
    • a. It doesn’t help temperature retention to use an insulated cart, whether plastic, aluminum or stainless steel. Any enclosed cart will perform about the same. Don’t pay more for a particular non-heated cart to help keep the food hot. It won’t.
    • b. Using heated carts does help ensure that the hot food is being served hot. This is especially helpful in higher population facilities where meal delivery takes longer to complete. If you can’t always deliver the meal in less than 30 minutes, you need to use heated carts if you want to serve hot food.
  2. 2. If you are using foam insulated meal trays, you need to be able to deliver the hot meals to the housing units in 45 to 50 minutes from tray up in the kitchen to first bite. Any longer than that will result in the hot food being 120°F or less. That temperature will typically be unsatisfying. “My hot dogs are cold”.
    • a. Any non-heated cart, including open utility carts, provide the same temperature retention when using insulated trays. Don’t pay more for a particular non-heated cart to help keep the food hot. It won’t.
    • b. Using a heated cart with insulated trays is a ‘belt and suspenders’ approach. In the end, it will have a good result for food temperature even with long delivery times. The hot food will definitely stay hot and the cold food won’t get warmed up. There are more efficient ways to achieve this result such as a two tray system. (see #6 in [the article titled “THE 6 MAIN CORRECTIONAL MEAL DEIVERY SYSTEMS”] for more details)
  3. 3. Regardless of which tray and which cart you use to deliver meals to the housing units, there are some things that you can do to help improve how hot the food is at point of service.
    • a. Start with the highest possible starting temp. There are many steps in the food service process that allow the food to cool so starting high will help achieve a higher temp in the end.
    • b. The biggest hit to temperature reduction is the hot food hitting the cooler tray surface. Approximately 20°F drop from this one step alone. Can you stage the trays somewhere in your kitchen to warm them slightly?
    • c. Just like hot coals piled together, the fuller meal delivery cart will retain temperature better than one with few meals in it.

  4. The 30 minute “cut-off” to serve hot meals with a non-heated cart can be a conflicting time point. “I can almost always make that but not 100% of the time”. “Am I close enough to that timing to get away with non-heated cart with no repercussions?”


    It would be nice to try with lower cost non-heated carts and then switch to heated carts if something changes and it becomes a problem. But buying a full set of non-heated carts and then asking my boss for money later to replace them with heated carts is not a good career move. One solution would be to buy non-heated carts that have the ability to be converted to heated carts later by snapping in a removable heat box. If this sounds like it might be a good idea for your facility, google “Mission Ready Corrections Carts” or click [HERE].


    Jones-Zylon-Tested-Trays-Guidelines.jpg

Blog Comments

* required fields